New information on Beata Klimek. The detective does not beat around the bush

It passes over five months from the day on which Beata Klimek from advisory disappeared without a trace. < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/63363b/620x0/1/0/2025/03/27/ammmg72i0w5kxdgcfwyw 9ptsdedylqpyxlxpvpwc.png" Alt = "Beata Klimek/YouTube @newsy Fast" styles = "background-color: rgba (143,125,116.1)" > < p > Although the services searched the property four times on which a woman was last seen for the last time, her body has not been found to this day. Detective Arkadiusz Andała, who got involved in the case, there is no doubt: there was a lot of & oacute; In his opinion, key evidence was neglected and the perpetrator was deliberately.

< p > Beata Klimek was seen for the last time on October 7, 2024. Monitoring installed on the property registered how a woman leaves the house with children to escort them to the stop. P & oacute; & oacute; ndash; Local residents saw her. But what next ?

< p > camera, which & oacute; was to register her return to the apartment, suddenly stopped working. & Amp; MDASH; Someone had to turn it off — M&P; Oacute; Wie Andał. The woman did not take the car with her, and her phone died down exactly at 8:40. The detective has no doubt & ndash; It was then a tragedy.

< P >Immediately after the disappearance, the services did not treat the matter as criminal, at first recognizing it as & ampquo; custom & & & ampquo;. The proceedings regarding the possibility of committing a crime did not start until November 14 & Amp; Ndash; over a month after the woman disappeared. < p > — The police made cardinal mistakes. The imprint was not secured in the finger in the fuse of the fuse, which could confirm the manipulation of the manipulation on devices & amph; ndash; emphasizes the detective. & ndash; This month of delay caused that key evidence was lost forever. < p > Although the activities of the services gained momentum over time, the search did not bring a breakthrough. The last action took place on March 26, 2025 & Amp; Ndash; As a result of reporting a witness, which & rye; ry claimed that after the disappearance of Beata he saw a freshly built mound in the garden adjacent to the house. A shovel was to lie at its top. Unfortunately, only the buried tarpaulin was discovered.

< P >Earlier searches included a plot, nearby ponds and a garage belonging to the missing husband & ndash; Jan K. worked on the spot R & oacute; < p > According to Arkadiusz Andała, there is a collusion of silence in the village, and many & oacute; b are afraid of the truth. He believes that the perpetrator of M & Amp; Oacute; Gł has long been preparing for the crime – he knew the area, took place to hide the body and the right time to act.

< p > — It was not an impulsive decision. It was a plan & ndash; accurate, cold and thoughtful & mdash; Detective claims

< P > Por & oacute; will bring this matter to the loud disappearance of Alicja Emperor from Chorzów & Amp; Ndash; There, the body was not found, and yet the woman's husband was convicted on the basis of clues. & Amp; MDASH; If the circumstantial evidence is confirmed here, justice can still triumph — adds andał.

< p > Arkadiusz Andała also mentions the disturbing behavior of Jan K. The man was to show journalists and a detective around the missing house, presenting a mess and dead mice to show that his wife was a messy person. & Amp; MDASH; It wasn't a mere conversation. It was a pries of building a negative image of a woman who disappeared. It did not look like a regret after losing a loved one — reports detective

< p > In addition, Jan K. from the beginning claimed that Beata & bdquo; voluntarily left her family and went to Germany to another man & Meanwhile, the family and the missing family and the missing children deny this version. & Amp; MDASH; Why nobody asked if it was possible ? why nobody lit the red lamp ? — asks anda.