Beata Klimek's husband presents a new version of events. The family reacts immediately

There is a dramatic fight for the truth about the disappearance of Beata Klimek-a 47-year-old resident is advising (West Pomeranian Voivodeship), which disappeared without a trace more than five months ago. < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/c04199/620x0/1/0/2024/12/02/t7fuuu4imknaizgqcc0xuqxq5crysa9k5a6siuopmf.png" alt = "Beata Klimek, source: youtube/Attention! TVN" styles = "background-color: rgba (109,97,105.1)" > < P >The family is convinced that the woman fell victim to the crime, and suspicions from the beginning are directed towards her husband, Jan K., from which & Oacute; Rym was in divorce. Meanwhile, the man surprises with the next version of the events & Amp; Ndash; This time he suggests that disappearance may be related to the wife's debt and financial problems.

< p > Beata Klimek was last seen on October 7, 2024, when she walked her children to the bus stop. The car & oacute; d was p & oacute; found at the house & ndash; This is a detailed disturbing one, because she used it almost every day. Since then, a trace of her has been lost. The search is ongoing, however, despite the four -time searches of the property and the participation of PS & oacute; in the tracking, the body or key evidence was not found. < P >Jan K., Beata's husband, denies from the beginning that he had any connection with the case. What's more, in the following months he changed his theories about disappearance several times. First, M & Amp; Oacute; Waled with a bdquo; going to her lover & then about Beata's alleged plan to give the children to his sister. Now he claims that the key can be money. < p > & ndash; I learned that the Germans demanded a refund of about 30 thousand. PLN, because the wife was charged 500+ in Poland, despite the fact that she had already received Kindergeld & Amp; Ndash; M&P; Oacute; WI Jan K. in an interview with & ampquo; He claims that Beata was to receive both benefits for a long time, which is incompatible with EU regulations. < p > according to his relationship, the German office asked him to indicate the person responsible for undertaken benefit. Jan was then to transfer the data of Beata Klimek. Is it possible that the woman disappeared for fear of execution of the debt ?

< P >Which arouses additional controversy, Jan K. does not hide that he has a new partner & ndash; Agnieszka B., a woman with a criminal past. According to the findings of the fact that she was convicted of the first husband of her first husband. She left the sentence after 1.5 years due to childcare. Her history and a sudden presence alongside Jan after the disappearance of Beata only intensify guesses.

< p > niece of the missing, Ola Klimek, definitely undermines the words of John. & Amp; MDASH; Aunt for some time did not receive support from Jan, so she applied for 500+ to provide children with being. It was Jan who collected Kindergeld and did not transfer money to children — m & oacute; wi. In her opinion, the new version of the events is another PR 'Oacute; Loosening of responsibility and reversal removal from earlier dubious translations. < p > & ndash; First, M & Amp; Oacute; was a white bus, then about escaping abroad, now about debt. These versions are mutually exclusive & ndash; emphasizes. < p > Detectives do not hide: in their opinion, Beata Klimek is dead, and everything indicates that there was a crime. Detective Arkadiusz Andała accuses the services of neglect and loss of key evidence & Oacute; Indicates R & oacute; to conflict the behavior of Jan K., which & oacute; ry according to his relationship during visits to the property behaved unnaturally indifferently, and spoke about his wife only in a negative way in a negative way & b.

< p > or the secret of the disappearance of Beata Klimek will ever be resolved ? variable versions, rumors and no specific breakthroughs & oacute; in hinder the investigation. The family does not stop in the fight for the truth, and each new theory poses more questions than answers. One thing is certain & ndash; This matter is not only the drama of one woman, but a painful warning that silence and chaos can bury justice for a long time.