< img src = "/uploads/blogs/89/92/ib-FS07ic86q_9ea2a6bb.jpg" Alt = "New YouTube interface angry users-which is wrong with it"/> ~ ~ ~ ~ < P > Youtube, which a month ago celebrated its 20th anniversary, began to test for a part of the audience a fully updated video player. The changes were so radical that many users called them “point of meaningless and bad decisions” and doubted the feasibility of radial.
< p > About it writes neowin.
< h2 id = "h2_0" > that has changed in the interface
< p >The new version of the player has redistributed controls. The playback button is most noticeable, immediately behind it is “Next”, the time indicator and navigation between the video & mdash; They are all now in their own capsules. The volume regulator moved to the opposite side of the panel, combining with the settings and full -screen mode. The whole set is on a translucent “matte” panel with a background blurry effect.
< P >< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/WYSIWYG/%D0%90%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BC/24032025/12414141414141 (49 kb) "width =" 550 "height =" 268 " />< /p > < p > The functional novelty is that it seems that it is no longer possible to change the volume of scrolling of the mouse wheel or keyboard arrows when the cursor is shown on a slider. The Neowin team also noticed that popular extensions like Sponsorblock break the menu location in the new layout.
< P >< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/Wysiwyg/%D0%90%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BC/24032025/212414141414141 (57 kb) "width =" 550 "Height =" 316 " />< /P > < P > Criticism did not occur for the first time: at one time a wave of dissatisfaction caused the disappearance of a bright red button “subscribe”, which was replaced with less noticeable gray with red text. Later, the community protested against increased miniatures to the main miniatures, transferring descriptions and comments to the side panel and hiding a public diesel meter. Changes in monetization policy have also repeatedly caused conflicts with the authors.
< p > now part of the audience has become inconvenient to navigate the updated controls, and individual users in social networks have suggested that developers were simply trying to prove their need, releasing unnecessary and unnecessary updates.
~