The metropolitan employee of the tax service really wanted to take a million for herself somewhere
On February 1, employees of the State Bureau of Investigation carried out searches at the leadership of the capital's tax office, in particular, at the acting. head of the tax service in Kyiv and deputy head of the Main Department of the State Tax Service in Kyiv, reports Ukrainska Pravda, citing law enforcement sources.
"Investigators of the Bureau are investigating the fact of illegal receipt of VAT refunds from the state budget, incl. through abuse of power and official position by representatives of the tax authorities.
Because of such actions, more than UAH 30 billion of public funds fell into the shadow circulation,” the message says.
According to the UP, we are talking about Oksana Datiy.
During the search, the woman found several wish lists for 2018 and 2021 New Year.
So, in 2018, Datius dreamed of a promotion, a sable coat, a trip to London and a birthday present from her beloved – a Breguet watch.
And in 2021, the official prophesied for herself the position of acting. head of the tax service of the capital, still wanted to relax with her husband in London and the Maldives and earn $ 1 million.
The Bureau noted that the official's standard of living does not correspond to the level of her official income: Datiy has 3 apartments in Kyiv with a total value of about $1 million, a house near Kyiv worth about $200,000, two cars worth about $150,000.
< p>The State Bureau of Investigation reports that Datii, through his proxies, implemented schemes to artificially inflate the gross costs of some enterprises, conduct business activities without registering an individual entrepreneur and provide false information about income.
According to expert estimates, more than 15 billion UAH.
In another episode, the leadership of the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in Kyiv was involved in schemes for illegally obtaining VAT refunds, as a result of which more than UAH 30 billion fell into the shadow circulation.
Tax officials “not notice” these schemes, maintain their existence or directly participate in them for the systematic receipt of payment for their “services”.
Prepared by: Nina Petrovich