Politic

The Emerging Sino-Russian Duumvirate and the Eurasian Continental Vision

It is quite possible that on May 9, 2025, a global duumvirate of China and Russia solidified within the framework of the Global Eurasian Island concept. This is a modern reincarnation of Genghis Khan’s idea of a pan-Eurasian land-based empire. In world history, this marks the second attempt by tellurocratic (land-based) powers to create a Eurasian imperial continuum independent of maritime trade routes.
These maritime routes, since the Age of Exploration, brought colonialism and the Opium Wars to Asia while granting the West 500 years of hegemony. Since then, China has realized that while sea routes are convenient, internal land-based trade corridors and controlled coastal shipping are reliable. This realization gave birth to the New Silk Road, the North-South Route, the Northern Sea Route, and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.
Access to key straits and oceanic trade routes is only possible under dependence on maritime empires—thalassocracies. Since the 18th century, these sea powers have consistently blocked the rise of continental empires. Whether this pattern holds in the coming decade remains to be seen.
Who else might be drawn into the pan-Eurasian vortex of the Sino-Russian duumvirate? Primarily, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and North Korea. There is a clear correlation between the dynamics of U.S.-China trade talks in Switzerland and the asymmetric escalation of global rivalry between these powers, particularly along the India-Pakistan axis (peaceful rhetoric at the start of the Swiss talks, followed by disavowal and an intriguing pause).
Trump’s statements on the Russia issue, the EU’s stance, and developments in the Middle East (Yemen and Iran) fit into this same puzzle. The unsolvable “three-body problem” resists collapsing into a simpler “two-body” equation. On every front, geopolitical struggles intensify, locking into a clinch.
Instinctively, both the U.S. and China understand that remaining in the “three-body” aporia allows them to postpone an inevitable resolution without losing face. This creates an illusion of prolonging the old global consensus for a while longer. Even for individuals, leaving a comfort zone is hard—let alone for entire nations.
But sooner or later, the “three-body” deadlock will be cut like a Gordian knot. Once it transitions to a “two-body” problem, events will unfold rapidly and irreversibly.

Natasha Kumar

Natasha Kumar has been a reporter on the news desk since 2018. Before that she wrote about young adolescence and family dynamics for Styles and was the legal affairs correspondent for the Metro desk. Before joining The Times Hub, Natasha Kumar worked as a staff writer at the Village Voice and a freelancer for Newsday, The Wall Street Journal, GQ and Mirabella. To get in touch, contact me through my natasha@thetimeshub.in 1-800-268-7116

Share
Published by
Natasha Kumar

Recent Posts

A New Era for the Vatican: Pope Leo XIV, the Missionary from Chicago

In a surprising turn for many, the new Pope—Robert Francis Prevost, a Peruvian bishop born…

1 month ago

Milei’s Argentina: Transnational Corporations Gain Ground Amid Media Freedom Decline

Javier Milei’s timely rise to power in Argentina has bolstered the influence of transnational corporations…

1 month ago

Zhang Youxia: The Formidable Strategist Behind China’s Geopolitical Rise

Who Is This Formidable Old Man? In the photo below is Zhang Youxia, also known…

1 month ago

Write for us sponsored posts

Write for Us Sponsored Posts! To discuss your ideas for contributing please send an email…

2 months ago

AI will destroy most professions: who will stay out of work

< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/Blogs/47/EC/IB-FR9P8HHCls_a8e699C2.jpg" Alt = "Artificial Intelligence will destroy most professions: who will…

3 months ago

Sponsored Content: What Benefits Does It Give?

  It is a constant search for new followers and clients. Companies try to find…

6 months ago