Anna Mucha published a sentence, Paulina Smaszcz accused her of a lie. What is the truth ? < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/a66d03/620x0/1/0/2025/03/27/kctdujsdngdrwk9yvqs alt = "Anna Mucha, Paulina Smaszcz/YouTube @Series-Strachenia" styles = "background-color: rgba (136,132,130,1)" > < p > as reported by the portal & ampquo; fact & rdquo;, recently it was loud about the legal dispute between Anna Mucha and the ex -wife of Maciej Kurzajewski & Amp; Ndash; Paulina Smaszcz. The actress decided to dispel them by presenting the content of the sentence regarding the disclosure of her personal data by Smahcz. She accused her of lying. The sentence was passed or not ? we know the answer.
Strong accusations
< p > sp & oacute; r between Anna Mucha and Paulina Smaszcz reaches time when it was loud about the relationship of Maciej Kurzajewski and Katarzyna Cichopek. After the actress disclosed unfortunately, she decided to enter the legal path.
< P > & AMP; BDQO; I reported the case to the police in June 2023, and then went to the court. A sentence was passed a year after this event. Personal data cannot be publicly disclosed, it is a crime. I have not commented on this so far, but if Paulina wants to question the facts, I will be forced to publish this judgment & & ndash; said the fly, cited by the portal & ampquo; fact &.
Anna Mucha did not throw the Słak; Oacute; in the wind and published the judgment. Then Paulina Smaszcz accused the actress of a lie. Service & AMP; BDQUO; Pudelek & Amp; Rdquo; He decided to contact the court in this case to verify which parties are right from the parties. < P > < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/f64871/620x0/1/0/2025/03/27/ya6z2egj1szf20elwslwnsllnhaeyhbdflfnydjb5f.png" alt = "Anna Mucha/YouTube @Seriale Summaries" loading = "lazy" Style = "background-color: rgba (114,102,108.1)" >
< P >< Strong > one of the versionswas confirmed < p > in court portal & bdquo; pudelek & rdquo; He determined that the order in the case was actually passed. At the same time, it was added that he automatically lost its legal force with Paulina's submission. This means that Anna Mucha has not committed lies or manipulation.
< p > The case is still underway. Now the matter was again dealt with by the District Court for Prague & Amp; Ndash; South. It should be remembered that order judgments are issued without the participation of the parties. When one of the parties challenges the verdict, the case goes to re -examination. < P > < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/addf80/620x0/1/0/2025/03/27/tv5njgqjhogktl0hjs5pibl8PZZZIQS7rme5ugwgz.png" alt = "Paulina Smaszcz/YouTube @Seriale Summaries" loading = "lazy" styles = "background-color: rgba (153,136,158.1)" > < p > what do you think about the whole matter ?