< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/Blogs/16/0C/IB-FRBEI59VP_C9316240.jpg" Alt = "Court Decision on" Voice of America "is a victory for journalists and freedom of press"/> ~ ~ ~ ~ < p > & laquo; fight – overcome & raquo;, – commanded classic.
< p > employees & laquo; voice of America & raquo; They sued the present leadership to protect freedom of speech, their honest name and stop the destruction & laquo; voice of America & raquo;.
~ ~ < p > yesterday the New York & nbsp; approved & nbsp; a decision in the case. Here are the key points of court decision:
< p > 1. Issued a temporary prohibition order (TRO).
< P > The court issued TRO prohibiting the Federal Government and USAGM officials to execute President Trump's decree of March 14, 2025, which aimed to close or sharply reduce operations & laquo; voice of America & raquo; < p > 2. Government is forbidden to stop the work of personal service contractors that make up a large part of the employees & laquo; the voice of America & raquo; and who received a termination notice after March 14 2025.
< p > The court also forbade the government to close USAGM offices or force employees out of the US to return to the US.
< p >3. The judge has decided that the government's actions violated:
< p > the position of the constitution;
< p > The principle of power distribution;
< P > Administrative Procedure (APA) and & Nbsp; Authorized Mandate of Congress USAGM.
< p > 4. The decision emphasized the irreparable damage of the freedom of the press and the physical security of journalists, especially those who have J-1 visas who will be forced to return to countries where they may face revenge, tracking or UV & rsquo;~ ~ > < p > 5. The court found that:
< P > The government was unable to provide a reasoned explanation of mass termination and shutdowns.
< p > These actions are directly contrary to the authority and authority of Congress on operations & laquo; voice of America & raquo;.
~ < p > no urgent justification for such decisive measures.
< p > 6. The judge rejected the government's request for a pledge of $ 23 million, confirming that access to legal protection should not be limited to financial burdens.
< p > Conclusion:
< p > This decision is a victory for journalists and freedom of the press. For PSC workers, who often do not have full federal protection, it offers immediate legal protection against dismissal. Government is temporarily forbidden to make closure or dismissal, and this decision can pave the way for further legal protection and permanent recovery at work.
< p > & laquo; we will still be very difficult, but it will never be ashamed & raquo;, – said the hero contemporary.