The clients of Privatbank fraudsters stole 117 thousand – which verdict of the court

< img src = "/uploads/blogs/5E/b0/ib-FR4Mij10o_c6fc9316.jpg" Alt = "from the clients of PrivatBank of frauds < P > The clients of the State & Nbsp; PrivatBank & nbsp; fraudsters wrote off 117 thousand UAH of credit, but filed a financial institution demanding to repay the debt to the bank. Is known to whose side the court became.

< P > This is evidenced by information on & nbsp; portals & nbsp; “Singy State Register of Judgments”.

< h2 > How fraudsters stole money from PrivatBank Credit < p >According to data in the decision of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv of February 12, 2025, PrivatBank appealed to the court to recover from a citizen a debt of 117 thousand hryvnias (95.33 thousand hryvnias & mdash; mdash; loan body, 21.66 thousand. < P > In May 2022, unknown wrote off credit funds from its account three tranches worth UAH 84.85 thousand. This was reported by the bank and law enforcement agencies.

< P > The bank after checking that the client himself from negligently passed the reference to receiving money from sale at the OLX site by tying a card on the third-party site and entering the data required to enter “Privat-24”. This allowed outsiders to access its account in the application.

< p > Bank set out, but the woman refused to give money stolen money. Because of this, the financial institution went to court. The woman filed a counterclaim.

< h2 > How was the court verdict

< p > According to the court decision, in satisfaction of her statement by the client to Privatbank for the invalidation of transactions & mdash; They refused because all financial transactions were carried out before the banking institution was notified. Instead, PrivatBank's claim to citizen was satisfied.

< p > The woman must pay for the bank because of her own carelessness formed debt of 117 thousand hryvnias.

< p >< Em > “we can conclude that the loss of funds occurred because of its own negligence and inaction to protect your own personal data and funds. The court concluded that the counter -claim”