The Christmas card published earlier this week by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has stirred up a lot of emotions and discussions among internet users.

Speculation Surrounds Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Christmas Card: It's About Their Children

In the tradition of the British royal family, publishing an elegant greetings card is an inseparable element of the holiday season. Prince Harry, despite stepping away from royal duties, decided to continue this custom.

Doubts about the authenticity of the photos

This year, the card featured photos of their children, Archie and Lilibet. However, some Internet users began to question the authenticity of the photos, suggesting that the couple may have hired actors to play the roles of their children. Such controversies diverted attention from the alleged crisis in the couple's marriage, and their fans focused on analyzing the photos.

Conversations about Harry and Meghan's Christmas card show how emotional the lives of members of the royal family, known by some as the firm, are, and how easy it is to raise doubts about their intentions. Whether these controversies are justified? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain – the royal family, even in an informal form, still attracts the attention of the media and the public.

With the approaching holiday season, the Sussexes decided to share their joyful wishes, sending warm words of prosperity for the coming year. Their message was enhanced by a touching photo collage that shows their involvement in the Archewell foundation. The focus was on a photo of their children – 5-year-old Archie and 3-year-old Lilibet — running towards their parents with open arms, which aroused enthusiasm among internet users.

Photo that stirred controversy

View this post on Instagram

Post shared by Meghan Markle (@meghan.markle.official)

Family the photo, in which they are also accompanied by three dogs, has gained a lot of attention. Unfortunately, not all Internet users have accepted it uncritically. On platform X, speculation has appeared about alleged edits to the photo. Critics have pointed out the &bdquo “Meghan's elongated” left hand and the unnatural angle of her foot. Additionally, a “cut” a dog's paw and a strange resemblance in the children's heights, which some have insinuated as evidence of the use of actors.

Despite the controversy, the family atmosphere of the photo and their contributions to the Archewell Foundation remain in the spotlight, reminding us of the value of closeness and love during the holiday season.

Don't Miss: Bible Prophecy for 2025 year. Is it already being fulfilled before our eyes

Take a look: Barbara Kurdej-Szatan triumphs once again.We will see her in the next production of Polish Television

Natasha Kumar

By Natasha Kumar

Natasha Kumar has been a reporter on the news desk since 2018. Before that she wrote about young adolescence and family dynamics for Styles and was the legal affairs correspondent for the Metro desk. Before joining The Times Hub, Natasha Kumar worked as a staff writer at the Village Voice and a freelancer for Newsday, The Wall Street Journal, GQ and Mirabella. To get in touch, contact me through my natasha@thetimeshub.in 1-800-268-7116