Diego Simeone does not read Van Basten. And if he hears you, he doesn't listen to him. The Dutch center forward stylist confessed a few days ago in EL PAÍS that football has become a sport owned by the coaches. “Now, we are basically talking about coaches. That's not good. They have become too important. Players need to assume more responsibilities, because they are the ones who have the most power to influence. Today if a team plays well or badly, we attribute it to the coach. And I really don't know what the coach's influence is. Liverpool is Klopp, Madrid is Zidane, City is Guardiola… ”.
More information Werner beats Suárez The ball condemns Atlético
Van Basten omitted the paternity of Atlético, one of the most author teams in the world of football. Cholo's interventionism borders on totalitarianism and in the recent tie against Chelsea it has been raised to the maximum expression. On the way out and on the way back. In Bucharest, with a defense of six in a line in which Correa and Lemar were the full-backs; Llorente (second top scorer of the team) and Hermoso the outside centrals, and Savic and Felipe, the interior centrals
This Wednesday at Stamford Bridge , the technician's interference with the changes, especially in the second half, became distressing for their own players. Substitutions and exchanges of tactical drawings every seven minutes. At 68 minutes, with more than 20 to go, he had already used up all three trade windows, plus the half-time wild card
It was in the intermission that the Argentine coach rectified his decision at the start of the game to play with a defense of four backs in a line (4-4-2). With the entry of Hermoso by Lodi, the team was placed with three centrals, a line of six midfielders (Trippier-Llorente-Koke-Saúl-Joao Félix-Carrasco) and an offensive reference, Luis Suárez (3-6-1). At exactly seven minutes (53 ′) Dembélé entered for Carrasco. New positional readjustment that was not settled or deciphered. There was no time. It was sensed that the Frenchman was standing on the right and Saul on the left. The photo lasted five minutes. At 58, Correa entered for Luis Suárez. It was like undoing the previous change. The Argentine went to the right-handed lane and Dembélé occupied the Uruguayan's zone.
The question was from the first month of the coaching course. Why hasn't Simeone substituted, and in the same window, Dembélé for Suárez, forward for forward, and Correa for Carrasco, midfielder for midfielder, without going through the intermediate stage that was only valid for five minutes? The team then went on to place itself in a 4-4-2, as at the beginning of the match.
Ten minutes later (68 ′), penultimate scramble: Lemar, an inside, by Trippier, a right back. New reorganization (3-5-2). The occupation of the spaces became even more sophisticated. Three centrals (Savic-Giménez-Hermoso); two high backs (Llorente and Saúl), three midfielders (Correa-Koke-Lemar) and two staggered forwards (Joao Félix and Dembélé). There was still one last piece movement before the end. This bound by the expulsion of Savic. Koke was placed as a right central and Lemar was placed as a theoretical midfielder.
All these tactical situations that occurred throughout the game are purely descriptive. Without going into the evaluation of the decisions. If it was convenient to withdraw Luis Suárez when the team had to score two goals no matter how much the Uruguayan was in the process of becoming the first player in the history of the Champions League to link 25 away games without scoring and in that match he would have lost seven balls, had a 67 percent success in the pass and would not have finished on goal
Or if so much change of position so continuously does not end up unhinging the players, no matter how versatile they may be and they no longer know exactly what is your position at all times. Saúl and Llorente were the most affected at the London night dance.
You can follow DEPORTES on Facebook and Twitter , or sign up here to receive our weekly newsletter .