After a long absence, Prince Harry appeared again in London. < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/57b05a/620x0/1/0/2025/04/09/nzqlqencr9nxftk0512oa8hhsunyesto2ktas7.jpg" alt = "Prince Harry, Screen YouTube @60minutes" styles = "background-color: rgba (68,49,35,1)" > < p > It is not about meeting his father, Kr & oacute; lem Karol III, or participation in the Kr & Oacute; Lewski celebrations. The oacute; dhide of this visit is completely different – and invariably raises controversy.
< p > 8 April 8 faced a court of appeal in a case that has been causing live emotions in the UK for several years. It is a decision from 2020 regarding the collection of protection financed from public money. Harry & ndash; Together with Meghan Markle & Amp; Ndash; Since then, he has taken a series of a step & in legal, pries < P > In the center of the dispute there is a ravec & ndash; The advisory group responsible for determining the level of protection of the member & Oacute; in the family of Kr & Oacute; Lewska and VIP-& Amp; Oacute; W. Harry's lawyers claim that the decision to take away his protection was not only opaque, but also made without the procedures and consultation with risk experts. < P >During the hearing, the prince's representative, Shadeed Fatima lawyer, pointed out that the decision to withdraw from the duties of “Oacute; in the family of Kr & Oacute; Lewska was not an expression of the free will of Harry & rsquo; ego and meghan.62 ~ < p > & ndash; They felt forced to leave because they decided that they were not sufficiently protected by an institution who served & ndash; emphasized the fatima.
< p > according to the legal team, it was the lack of security that was one of the key reasons for their trip to the state & oacute; in the United. There were also arguments in court documents regarding external threats – among others threats from al-Qaeda or a loud paparazzi chase from 2023, which & oacute; ry Harry por & oacute; brought to tragic events in the life of his mother, Princess Diana.< p > Importantly, the prince does not demand the restoration of full protection entitled to active members of the Kr & Oacute; Lewska. Only strives for a fair assessment of the level of risk and the transparency of the decisions taken against him.
< p > Media speculate that SP & oacute; o protection m & oacute; mainly strain the relationship of Harry & rsquo; ego with father. The prince himself was often suggested that the monarch M & Oacute; Głby to intervene in his case. However, according to British journalists, including the editorial staff of the Independent & Amp; RDQUO;, Kr & Amp; Oacute; L does not have constitutional rights to influence the decisions made by ravec.< p > Although court proceedings concern specific procedures and formal decisions, in a broader context becomes a reminder of tensions, which & re; re still exist between Harry and the institution of the monarchy. The question is whether the pending trial will bring the parties closer to the agreement, or if they gave them away from each other & ndash; remains unanswered.