What the world would look like after a nuclear attack ? < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/b1e828/620x0/1/0/2022/03/16/1kwv3wbqqq2md3swtcp5AV5m4kbfh0fjq8y9culiri.png" alt = "atomic explosion/youtube @olsen" styles = "background-color: rgba (93,107,116,1)" > < p > This question, though terrifying, is increasingly becoming the subject of public debate. Investigative journalist Anna Jacobsen, finalist of the Pulitzer Award, in her latest book & ampquo; Nuclear War: A SCHEARIO & AMP; RDQO; He takes the reader & oacute; in the dark sublime after the hypothetical world after a global nuclear conflict. Its predictions are unambiguous — Survival would be an exception. Hope only two countries: Australia and New Zealand.
< P > In the podca of The Diary of a CEO Annie Jacobsen presented the moving scenario of the attack with a thermonious bomb with one megaton. Such a load is not only an explosion, but a whole cascade of dramatic effects & oacute; in:< P >& ndash; The temperature in the epicenter would reach 180 million & oacute; in the steps of Celsius & ndash; explains Jacobsen. & ndash; Whole cities would disappear in a split second, and the shock and fire would destroy everything within a few kilometer & oacute; w.
< p > those who would not die immediately, would have to face another enemy — radiation poisoning. This is a slow, devastating agony lasting hours, days and even weeks. In addition, the so -called megapożar, covering a hundred kilometer & in square.
< p > & ndash; Whole cities would burning, and living organisms could observe the wall of fire approaching them without the possibility of escaping & ndash; describes the author. < p > In this apocalyptic landscape Jacobsen indicates two countries who would have the greatest chance to preserve civilization: Australia and New Zealand. < p > & ndash; Thanks to the geographical location, the lack of strategic target & oacute; in military and ability to self -sufficient food production & ndash; translators. < p > What's more, in these regions agriculture could survive and the atmosphere would not be so strongly contaminated. Meanwhile, the rest of the world would stand in the face of nuclear winter, covered with radioactive snow, with a damaged ozone layer and life pushed underground. < p > Book Annie Jacobsen is not a catastrophic fantasy, but a hypothetical scenario based on scientific knowledge and military analysis. < p > & ndash; It is not supposed to be a scare. This is to be a warning & ndash; M & oacute; wi author.< p > Although most of the world live with the hope that nuclear weapons will remain only a symbol of political deterrence, the expert reminds that one mistake, one order, one impulse. And then only a few will have a chance for a new beginning.