A wedding is an event that for many couples is to be a dream come true – a carefully planned celebration, during which every detail is to correspond to their vision. < img src = "https://zycie.news/crrops/e50758/620x0/1/0/2025/03/15/ykuhgyo7ime5wnmbKKKzxxqd1coJWD3dya1Uw02.jpg" alt = "wedding @pexels" Style = "background-color: rgba (102,101,93.1)" > < p > However, one of the future brides caused a wave of comments and a hot discussion, revealing what exactly was in the contract with the DJ responsible for the music at her wedding. Pow & oacute; d ? categorical ban on disco polo.
< p > The Internet user published a recording on a thicket, in which & Oacute; Rym revealed that because of her hypersensitivity to specific sounds, she decided to reserve in the contract what songs could and which could not be played during the wedding. And yes, although the list includes iconic hits like & ampquo; m & oacute; j is this piece of floor & rdquo; Is & Bdquo; Brathanki & rdquo;, this is completely excluded disco polo and the so -called & AMP; BDQO; Hiphopolo & < P >& ndash; Since it is entered in the contract, there are also contractual penalties. That's why I'm calm & ndash; She admitted, explaining that it was not about fad, but about mental comfort. < p > Although many people & oacute; b understood the decision of the bride and praised her courage in creating a wedding on her own terms, but the overwhelming part of the Internet user & oacute; in it did not hide their indignation. In the comments under the recording there were voices of disappointment and warning that a wedding without disco polo may be & Hellip; flap. < p > & ampquo; the wedding is for you, but the wedding is made by the very assumption for guests' & rdquo;, & bdquo; there is no disco polo & ndash; There is no fun & rdquo;, & ampquo; I was at such a wedding, the guests began to go out before p & oacute; & & & ndash; Internet users wrote, accusing the future bride of egoism and a lack of understanding for R & Amp; Oacute; Lord's tastes & oacute; in invited guests. < p > others drew attention to the unusuality of such a record in the contract and the fact that DJ had to adopt quite unusual conditions of the & oacute; There were also more balanced opinions, according to which & oacute; each couple has the right to organize a party consistent with their own values & ndash; Even if it is a controversial one< p > regardless of the division of the opinion, one thing is certain: more and more often young couples make bold decisions for the sake of their comfort and aesthetics, even if it means opposing traditional wedding schemes. Is this the beginning of a new trend in the approach to weddings, or a temporary wave of individualism ? time will show. < br />< br />< /p > < p >< center >