< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/Blogs/03/0E/IB-FS082508R_40DF4A49.jpg" Alt = "Man came under court for espionage for Russian Federation under the guise of love for architecture"/> ~ < P >< Strong > The received files he sent the above representative of the Russian Federation, using the messenger & laquo; Telegram & raquo;. < 62 />< /p > < P > In the Central District Court of Mikolaev, a trial proceedings on charges of a 49-year-old local resident in committing a criminal offense under Part 2 of Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (State betrayal, committed in martial law). < P > Recall, according to the indictment, in February 2023, the man agreed for the monetary remuneration to provide the Russian Federation with information on the location and movement of units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, OB & Rsquo; Critical Infrastructure in Mikolaev. < p >Subsequently, he arrived in the Nikolaev regional shopping center and JV, where he made photos and video fixation of the location of the building, servicemen who were in the territory, inputs and exits. The accused was also fixing one of the district shopping center and JV in Nikolaev.

< p > He sent the received files to the above representative of the Russian Federation, using the messenger & laquo; Telegram & raquo;. In addition, he provided data of his bank account to receive a cash remuneration.

< p > The court completed a study of written evidence and started interrogation of the accused.

< p > The latter stated that the case against it is a fabricated law enforcement officers. He also noted that he only filmed a mobile building on the camera, which, in his opinion, were interesting from an architectural point of view. The court assured that he was not aware that he was fixing the buildings of the shopping center and the joint vent < p > on cash for the sent video files, stated that he was simply curious that a person could transfer money for a video image of Mykolaiv houses. The accused assured the court that in his correspondence it was only about the history and architecture on which he was understood. The referral question of the judge regarding what he has to do with architecture was unable to provide a specific answer.

< P > Currently, to resolve a request for extension of detention in respect of the accused, the court was removed to the conference room.

Natasha Kumar

By Natasha Kumar

Natasha Kumar has been a reporter on the news desk since 2018. Before that she wrote about young adolescence and family dynamics for Styles and was the legal affairs correspondent for the Metro desk. Before joining The Times Hub, Natasha Kumar worked as a staff writer at the Village Voice and a freelancer for Newsday, The Wall Street Journal, GQ and Mirabella. To get in touch, contact me through my natasha@thetimeshub.in 1-800-268-7116