< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/Blogs/50/2b/IB-FREC78R5N_7B271523.jpg" Alt = "Musk Protects the Personal Data of users X in the US Supreme Court"/> ~ < P > X X asked to protect users from law enforcement requests for personal data. Musk stressed that platforms should not help governments.
< p > New statement of the company X to the US Supreme Court is part of a long -term case related to the client of the Cryptocurrency Exchange Coinbase, whose data was transferred to the US domestic income service in countering tax fraud.
~ < p >Transmits & nbsp; unn & nbsp; with reference to & nbsp; Financial Times.< h2 > details
< P > X Ilona Mask asks the Supreme Court to protect users from US law enforcement agencies.
< P > Ilona Muska's social media companies have asked the Supreme Court to protect their users by interfering with a case of a order of access to personal data.
~ ~ ~ > 62 ~ 62 < P > X X filed a statement that refers to concern “wide, wicked” inquiries. It is emphasized that platforms “should not be forced to help governments undermine the confidentiality of their users.”
< h3 > context
< p >The application for Friday's support is part of the long -term case, which was violated by James Harper, the user of the COINBase cryptocurrency exchange. He claims that he was one of thousands of COINBASE clients whose trade was transmitted by the US domestic income service as part of the “fishing expedition” of the Office on potential tax fraud that violates the site privacy policy.
~ ~ ~ < p > The plaintiff's victory in a case that the Supreme Court has not agreed to consider, restricting the US government, part of which is Ilon Musk, in the right to demand from X transfer data without “sufficient grounds and specific suspicions”.
~ ~ < H3 > Access to data as a component of new control for migrants
< P > A person close to X said that Harper's case “is concerned that the user's language [x] may be restricted if the government is allowed to access users' data without a searched order.”
< blockquote > < P class = "quotecontent" > This problem does not apply to X. This means that the Constitution does not forbid government to view account accounts of any user on any social networks or financial platform
~ ~ < P > Time of intervention X – the only private corporation that has today filed a statement in this case – draws attention in view of the use of Trump by public materials on social networks for migrant verification.
~ ~ ~ ~ < P > Last month the Ministry of Internal Security suggested expanding the collection of data on the applicants' social networks for visa and those who wish to apply for a residence in the US.