Musk could not stop the commercialization of the company that he created himself

< img src = "/uploads/blogs/08/4c/ib-fqoodgb9_fc931624.jpg" Alt = "Musk could not stop the commercialization of the company"/> ~ > < p >Judge Yuunne Gonzalez Rogers surprised the whole technological world: she not only rejected Ilon Mask's request to ban Openai's commercial transformation, but also accelerated his consideration of his claim against the company and Microsoft. This solution has become a turning point in a multi -billion -dollar conflict, where the founder of Tesla and SpaceX tries to stop the fact that he once helped to create. & Amp; nbsp; & nbsp;

~ ~ < p > Ilon Musk states that Openai and its CEO Sam Altman violated their arrangements, transforming a non -profit organization into a profitable giant. He accused the company of an attempt by monopoly, stating that management warned investors not to invest in competitors, including his own XAI. However, the judge recognized these arguments as weak, referring to Altman's letters, saying that the restrictions concerned only those investors who were allowed to know the “secrets” of the company. & Amp; nbsp; & nbsp;

~ ~ ~ ~ > 62 > 62 > < p >Moreover, Openai counterattacked, revealing the correspondence of 2016. It turned out that Musk himself proposed to turn Openai into a part of Tesla to get control over SI technologies. “It's not just a dispute about money & ndash; here in the game the future of artificial intelligence,” & ndash; said the company representative. & nbsp; & nbsp;

< p > in February Musk made an incredible proposal: to buy Openai for $ 97.4 billion. But the company refused, stating that “does not want to be part of the empire where AI serves as the interests of one person.” This confirmed the version of Openai that Musk always wanted to use their technologies for their projects, ignoring the mission of the company “Build AI for the benefit of humanity”. & Amp; nbsp; & nbsp;

~ ~ ~ ~ < P > Despite the refusal to block, the judge gave a mask a chance: hearing the claim will accelerate because of “public interest” and “threat of harm” if the transformation of OpenAi is contrary to the laws. This means that the battle between the giant of the car industry and the leading Shi company will be resolved throughout the year & ndash; While Openai is already negotiating a new corporate structure. & nbsp; & nbsp;

< P > If Openai wins the lawsuit, its commercial status will become official, opening the way to large -scale investments and partnerships. But Musk may find other pressure methods: its XAI is actively developing its own models, and Tesla already uses ABI for autopilots. & Amp; nbsp; & nbsp;

~ ~ ~ < p > This conflict is not just about money & ndash; It is a struggle for control over technologies that will determine the future of medicine, transport and even global policy. Whatever the case, it has already changed the rules of the game in the world of artificial intelligence. & Amp; nbsp; & nbsp;