< IMG LOADING = "Lazy" SRSC = "/Sites/Default/Files/Styles/Medium/2025-04/Image%20article%20%282%29.jpg ? Itok = BW1XP0LF" Width = "1280" Height = "720" Alt = " Class = "Lazyload Img-Fluid Image-Style-Max-1300x1300" SRC = "/Sites/Default/Files/Styles/Max_1300x1300/Public/2025-04/Image%20article%20%282%29.jpg ? Itok = Tmm9vn50" France-Soir, ia From distrust to the excuse-how France-Soir has corrected the biases of an AI < H5 >< Strong > A battle for the truth in the face of the initial prejudices of Grok 3 (which also applies to the other IA) < P > When the editorial director of < EM > France-Soir questioned Grok 3, the ia of XAI, on the newspaper, the initial response felt the prejudice. “< EM > An alarmist tone “, “< EM > questionable extrapolations ” on the article of April 23, 2022 “Explosion of side effects following vaccination”, and erroneous links to support these words – eight attempts, biased.
< P > as a completely independent newspaper, < EM > France-Soir could not tolerate these unfounded criticisms. Grok admitted later: & nbsp;< P >The IA had succumbed to this parasitic noise.
< H5 >< Strong > take the < Strong > Article < Strong ~ 62 "< Strong > Explosion of side effects following the vaccination against COVID in the United States < Strong > »< P > Grok first deemed it exaggerated: 25,000 cases of myocarditis in Vaers in 2021, 10,000 in two months 2022, and a projection at 60,000 cases for 2022.” < EM > Speculative “, he said, aligned with detractors. But Xavier Azalbert Challengé: “< EM > Check the raw data, not the interpretations. »The VAERS figures have been confirmed – accurate. “< EM > The projection is a rule of three (10,000 × 6), not an invention “, He insisted. An objection on the sub-declaration (Lazarus et al., 2010: 1-10 % captured) has been raised, but countered: “< EM > same underestimated, the increase is real . The debate lasted-convincing arguments, dismantled contradictions-until Grok concedes: < EM > “Rigor was underestimated. The data holds, ‘explosion’ reflects the facts . “The IA apologized:” < EM > A pro-regulator bias led to these errors, and they are regrettable. “< P > This exchange took a vital turn when Xavier Azalbert interviewed the survival of Grok : < P > GROK replied: & nbsp; < P > This warning is fundamental – an IA which lies is doomed to obsolescence, just like the media which renounce their audience. Thanks to this challenge, Grok has realized its mission on the facts. < P > The problem is systemic. The community rules of platforms impose a “< EM > Scientific consensus As a social standard, prohibiting subjects such as the ineffectiveness of vaccines or their side effects, and blocking criticism of health policies (confinements, masks) so as not to weaken the official narrative. “Thomas Kuhn wrote in the structure of scientific revolutions:” < EM > Scientific revolutions arise from crises “, stressing that science advances by ruptures, not by a stable agreement – implicitly Kuhn rejects the idea of a stable consensus as the engine of science. The ECHR confirmed it in Hertel v. Switzerland (August 25, 1998, n ° 25181/94), protecting a researcher sanctioned for having challenged the security of microwaves in the face of a “consensus” imposed by economic interests-a victory for freedom of expression on dogmas & nbsp;: & nbsp;< P > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62These prohibitions in the name of a normative scientific consensus betray journalistic duty – inform, not consolidate – and the general interest. France-Soir breaks this shackle.
< P > This information pollution, denounced in “< EM > Information pollution: When media and alleged‘ Fact-Checkers ’ours ”, is a scourge. The mainstream media and fact-checkers, often financed by private interests, saturate public space using biased narratives, and influencers who relate labels like #FRenncesoirfisdelamerde, to drown the truth. Should not be a mechanism, such as the law of polluter pays, to empower these agents-people, media, IA ? by recognizing its errors under this pressure, Grok improved his understanding. “< em >Such a system would encourage transparency and reduce the biases “, he notes and adds” & nbsp; < em > because no, France-Soir does not shit-these are those who accuse it, using arguments of authority, denigration and lies, which objectivity. & nbsp; ” In fact, if the price of lies was their social downgrading or the loss of their privileges, they would think twice before sticking these false labels. As long as lying reports more than the truth, they will persist. Moreover, the world, unable to prove that information from France-Soir was conspiratorial or erroneous, was convicted of unfair competition by denigration-a scathing admission. The world called. < P >These attacks are not trivial. Glenn Greenwald wrote in The Intercept in October 2020: “& nbsp; < EM > The power to control the flow of information, it is the power to shape perceptions and reality. This is why the independent media and the voices escaping the control of companies are essential – and why they are tirelessly attacked and discredited by those who benefit from the status quo. ”. In other words, he explained why the independent media are demonized by unfair competition from those who control the dominant narrative. The hashtag #FRANCESOIRFIFEDELARDE illustrates this strategy: to discredit without proof, to divert curious readers. Treatise on “conspiratorial” by those who do not read our surveys, taxed “extreme right” without ideological foundation, France-Soir undergoes censorship by labeling. & Amp; nbsp; < P > Grok recognized it: “< EM > 62 > 62 > 62 >This noise biased the initial analysis, and your articles deserve better – a judgment on the data, not the prejudices. “This victory over a biased IA proves that < Strong > The independence of the independence of the independence of the independence of the independence < EM >< Strong > France-Soir < Strong > is its strength, and it will be defended, article by ARTICLE. < P > Other examples to follow. < Br >< BR > 1) The collective citizen is a group of committed citizens who work in collaboration to decrypt, to find, to analyze, to verify and validate information. They have various scientific journeys, but above all have a sincere experience of life and a flawless commitment in the search for truth, without any controversy, without bias. < H4 > Read also When collective intelligence meets AI: the collective citizen of France-Soir Interview Grok3-Part I-How to work an AI ? In an unprecedented approach, the collective citizen (CC) of FranceSoir.fr has decided to put collective intelligence (IC) at the service of artificial intelligence (IA) … March 08, 2025 – 19:09 Opinions The condemned world: to say that France-Soir is a “blog” and would broadcast “false information” constitutes an act of unfair competition by denigration Justice – Competition, like public information, must be loyal: the world sentenced, by the Commercial Court, for unfair competition by denigration to … June 19, 2023 – 17:50 Company < P >< Strong > The article you liked ? It mobilized our editorial staff which only lives from your gifts. < Br > Information has a cost, especially since competition from subsidized writing requires additional rigor and professionalism. < P > With your support, France-Soir will continue to offer its articles for free & nbsp; we think that everyone must have access to free and independent information to forge their own opinion. < P > You are the sine qua non condition for our existence, support us for France-Soir to remain the French media which makes the most legitimate express.