< img src = "/uploads/blogs/dc/84/ib-Fqak39cfl_ef7b2715.jpg" Alt = "a man was tried for a message in Viber about moving the shopping center: was it avoided in ' < p > Podvolochy district court on February 7 proclaimed a sentence to a resident of the village. Gorodnitsa for obstruction of the legitimate activity of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations during their conscription for military service in a special period.
< p > reports this < p > a man threatened from P & Rsquo; twice up to eight years in prison. He failed in court, but took place in a conditional term.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" > a man threatened from P & Rsquo; yata to eight years in prison. He's blame in court recognized and occurred in a conditional term.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" >As you learned & laquo; 20 minutes & raquo;, Oleg B. & mdash; Married, together with his wife raising a minor child. There is no official work. And there were no problems with the law before, from now on it will have & laquo; crime & raquo; In the biography & raquo; because he tried to warn the countrymen about the movement of shopping mall workers. And, as it sounds in the indictment that came to court, & mdash; & laquo; creation of obstacles, obstacles aimed at preventing, terminating or prohibiting the conduct of individual actions, or maneuvers of the Armed Forces and other military formations, making tactical or strategic decisions by management, or personnel by military forming or significant reduction of its effectiveness & raquo;.
< h2 > reported the shoal and villages
< P class = "ck_editor_p" > Oleg was an active user of social networks and in one of the Viber groups from July to November reported the movement of TCC & mdash; in particular in rock and nearby villages.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" >& mdash; Recognizing and anticipating that such actions can lead to the undermination of Ukraine's defense capability in the conditions of martial law, in his reports he noted information about the place and time of the relevant measures with the 5 department of the specified military formations, for timely informing of Ukrainian citizens who intend to evade their obligation 'Ukraine's protection, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine during the mobilization in a special period, & mdash; It is in the case file that we find out from the Register of Judgments.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" > November 19, 2024 Oleg was exposed by employees of the Security Service of Ukraine in the Ternopil region during a search of him at home. The man was accused of Part 1 of Art. 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and after the end of the investigation was sent to court.< h2 > five years in prison & mdash; For one and a half conditionally
< P class = "ck_editor_p" >On January 16, 2025, the Head of the Supervision of the Laws of the Regional Security Authority of the Ternopil Regional Prosecutor's Office and the accused concluded an agreement on the recognition of guilt. Oleg has undoubtedly pleaded guilty, and his lawyer and prosecutor asked the court to approve the agreement.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" > & mdash; To be guilty of committing a criminal offense under Part 1 of Art. 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, having imposed on him the parties of imprisonment for a term of P & Rsquo; years of years, & mdash; This was the sentence of the Pidvolochysk District Court. & mdash; On the basis of Art. 75 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to be released from serving a sentence with a test period for one year six months.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" > on a man who fought with & laquo; Busification & raquo; in Viber, put on a duty & Rsquo; lies:
< ul class = "ck_editor_ul" > < Li Class = "ck_editor_li" > periodically with & Rsquo; to be registered with the authorized body for probation; ~ ~ < Li Class = "ck_editor_li" > notify the authorized body of probation for changing your place of residence, work or study; < Li Class = "ck_editor_li" > Do not travel outside Ukraine without agreement with the authorized probation authority.
< P class = "ck_editor_p" > This sentence can be appealed on appeal within thirty days from the date of its pronouncement by filing an appeal to the Ternopil Court of Appeal.
~ ~ ~ ~