< IMG SRC = "/Uploads/Blogs/97/88/IB-FR1555V5D8_3BC51151.jpg" Alt = "in Ukraine up to 6 years sentenced a party Sharius for information about the Armed Forces in Telegram"/> < P > Pervomaisky City District Court of Mykolaiv Oblast found a local resident guilty of crimes against national security.
~ < p > reports & nbsp; & laquo; judicial reporter & raquo;.
< P > In 2023-2024 the accused of six subscribers has distributed materials from other pro-Russian propaganda channels.
< p >In July 2024 in Pervomaisk, the accused saw a special train loaded with military armored equipment near the bridge. Returned home, the man reported it in his telegram-channel for six subscribers: & nbsp; < Em > & laquo; Paul Time ago, a single species of the T-64 type tank to the center of the Center. It was already dusted that it was not necessary to take a photograph. Composition from 4 wagons all one Passagir and 3 platforms with tanks & raquo;. 0 >/p > < p >< Em > In court hearing man did not admit it and asked to justify it. & nbsp; explained that he really created a telegram channel, to which he joined four more of his former like-minded people who supported the so-called & laquo; Sharia & raquo; to its ban. He used to be the head of the branch of this party. He believed that no one could join the group without his permission as an administrator. But the sixth user joined on his own, because, in his opinion, he was a specialist of the Security Service of Ukraine, who used special opportunities to expose it. & Amp; nbsp;
~ < p > The accused did not deny that he wrote those messages referred to in the indictment. But he disagrees that this way was spread, because the group was & laquo; closed & raquo; No one other than participants could read them. He wrote about the movement of military equipment in a group without any criminal intent. Stressed that he did not indicate the exact list of military equipment, its characteristics and direction.
< p > to the accused's denial that the channel was & laquo; closed & raquo; For non-participants, and there were only five, the court explained that the spread was meant to bring information in any way to at least one person. & nbsp; Such a conclusion is contained in & nbsp; nbsp & nbsp; the Supreme Court a similar case to dissemination < p > a man was found guilty of justification of war, calls for a violent change of state power and the illegal dissemination of information about the movement of weapons territory of Ukraine.
< p > He received 6 years of prison without confiscation of property. From the summer last year he is already in custody.
< P > The Card of PP & Laquo; Laquo; Sharia & Raquo;,, Applications for Admission to the Party and copies of the party newspaper & laquo; right to truth & raquo;